Reviews for
GMCD 7194 - Paul Müller-Zürich
Neue
Zürcher Zeitung, Ressort Feuilleton, 30. Mai 2001, Nr.123, Seite 66
Längsschnitt durch das Werk Paul Müllers
tsr. Der Zürcher Komponist Paul Müller (1898-1993) war als
Theorielehrer am Konservatorium nicht nur eine prägende Figur des Zürcher Kulturlebens,
sondern als Komponist auch eine der führenden Gestalten der Schweizer Kunstmusik des
20. Jahrhunderts. Die vorliegende CD bietet einen Längsschnitt durch das Werk
Müllers mit dem Schwerpunkt Kammermusik. Für die frühe Phase am Schnittpunkt zwischen
Spätromantik und Neobarock und auch für die Nähe zu Othmar Schoeck stehen die 1924-26
entstandenen Klavierstücke op. 10. Ganz im neobarocken Stil gehalten ist dann das
Concerto in f-Moll für Bratsche und kleines Orchester (1934), das in einer historischen
Aufnahme mit Gerhard Wieser und dem Radio-Orchester Beromünster unter der Leitung von
Edmond de Stoutz zu hören ist. Eine originelle Besetzung bietet das c-Moll-Quartett für
Violine, Klarinette, Cello und Klavier, das Roland Roberts, Alan Hacker, Oliver Gledhill
und Andrew Zolinsky mit wachem Gespür für wechselnde Klangfarben interpretieren. In der
Sonate für Violine und Klavier op. 32 (1941) hat der Komponist einen Ausgleich zwischen
kontrapunktischem Reichtum und lyrischem Ausdruck gefunden; ein geradezu intimes Gepräge
zeichnet hier den langsamen Variationssatz aus. Das Alterswerk ist mit dem harmlosen Trio
für Bassetthorn, Viola und Cello etwas leichtgewichtig vertreten. Dafür trägt der erste
Satz, die als Neujahrsstück der Allgemeinen Musikgesellschaft Zürich entstandene
Serenata turicensis, augenzwinkerndes Lokalkolorit.
Paul Müller-Zürich: Bratschenkonzert op. 24, Sechs Klavierstücke
op. 10, Violinsonate op. 32, Trio für Bassetthorn, Viola und Violoncello (1981), Quartett
op. 26. Gerhard Wieser (Viola), Radio-Orchester Beromünster, Leitung: Edmond de Stoutz;
Andrew Zolinsky (Klavier), Alan Hacker (Klarinette, Bassetthorn), Roland Roberts
(Violine), Miranda Davis (Viola), Oliver Gledhill (Violoncello). Guild GMCD 7194 (1 CD).
Classics on the Web - March
Paul MÜLLER-ZÜRICH (1898-1993)
Viola Concerto (1934) [22.01]
Six Piano Pieces (1924-26) [13.02]
Violin Sonata (1941) ]15.37]
Trio (basset-horn, viola and cello) (1981) [12.37]
Quartet (violin, clarinet, cello and piano) (1937, rev 1971) [12.39]
Gerhard Wieser (viola)
Swiss Radio Orchestra, Beromünster/Edmond de Stoutz
Andrew Zolinsky (piano)
Roland Roberts (violin)
Alan Hacker (clarinet)
Miranda Davis (viola)
Oliver Gledhill (cello)
GUILD GMCD 7194 [79.26]
Even the name's quaintly informative. It tells us that this composer was the
youngest of a generation of Swiss composers who all became known internationally -
eventually: Othmar Schoeck (1886-1957), Frank Martin (1890-1974) and Arthur Honegger
(1892-1955). Paul Müller-Zürich was born in Zurich 21 June 1898, young enough to absorb
the influence of these older composers as well as, more immediately, that of Busoni pupil,
Philipp Jarnach whom he studied with. Jarnach is best known for completing his master's Doktor
Faust in C minor, in 1925; whereas Anthony Beaumont has revised the whole to an
emphatic E flat major gleam of hope. That tells you something about the
expressionist-tinged late romanticism that also made up Jarnach's character. Busoni's
living influence transmitted itself deeply enough for his Young Classicism to transmute
into Müller-Zürich's neo-baroque modes.
Aesthetics aside it's Othmar Schoeck's sound-world that Müller-Zürich
first evokes. The Six Piano Pieces (1924-26) move from that world - Schoeck's
lieder without the words, perhaps. The first 'entrata' is suggested as almost a set of
variations on Schoeck's Consolation for piano (1919). The most Schoeckian of all,
is the second piece, Elegie: a rich evocation, tinged with individual melody. This
really flowers later on. Towards the end of the cycle Bach pops up - perhaps reflecting
that the two years of the cycle spanned a formative period. Here we find counterpoint, a
move to angularity and a busier line. Late romanticism rather engorges this, and again
it's that intriguing chromatic edge of Busoni's that comes to mind. This is late
romanticism stretching a clenched fist of solidarity to Schoenberg, but athletic with
neo-classic forefingers. Effective, but one misses the piano music Schoeck never got round
to writing. Andrew Zolinsky's playing, and the piano sound are excellent.
Ten years later comes the bulk of the work on this disc. First, the
1965 ADD recording with Gerhard Wieser of the Viola Concerto in f minor Op 24 (1934), for
me the most attractive work, together with the Piano Quartet and the second of the piano
pieces. Hindemith had written two viola concertos before this, of course, in his
Kammermusik, and their angularity is reflected here. Clearly both composers had mellowed
by 1934 - it's more true to say Müller-Zürich had always retained a romantic tinge to
his thematic material. The opening is a case in point, neo-baroque in its repeated
ostinato-like Fs it suddenly dips decorously at the end of two bars and rises the same
stairs. A cadenza follows as centre-piece and swiftly returns to the opening after some
development. The second movement is based around a slowly winding three-note theme, with
some wonderful playing off against the oboe. The third starts with a pre-echo of Walton's
'Death of Falstaff' from Henry V, and then proceeds on a set of passacaglia
variations. The alla giga returns us to an exhortative homage to Hindemith, almost
... In fact it reminds one tangentially of Franz Reizenstein (1911-68), that pupil of both
Hindemith and Vaughan Williams. And something oddly modal creeps into some of
Müller-Zürich's work. There's something almost English about all this, which is merely
to say that the different sensibilities of Swiss composers inhabit a world of reticence
and melancholy not far removed from much British music. It's really memorable and shaped
to the viola's inherent melancholy. Had Müller-Zürich heard Hindemith play the Walton?
Either way, it heralds something of a discovery for viola players, should they get to hear
of it. Only the BBC would have the courage to programme it, but as the single
representative of Müller-Zürich's orchestral works on this disc it begs several
questions. Guild could hardly afford to licence other orchestral recordings, and decide to
follow this vintage performance with chamber music.
It's another Walton who enters the lists for Müller-Zürich: Chris
Walton, the Schoeck scholar who pushed his composer to a BBC centenary and started the
revivals. No doubt this accounts for his acuity in noting Schoeck's piano piece in the
first of the Op. 10. He's given scant space to expound on his subject before the group of
attractive Guild-gathered players are given their biography.
A Second String Quartet of 1961 had Müller-Zürich defending his by
now old-fashioned stance against Darmstadt. He suggested that even traditional music set
problems that each time had to be answered freshly. It begs questions, though. On this
evidence, Müller-Zürich was a consummate master of large-scale forms in a romanticised
neo-classicism, and recalling the finest of Hindemith's and Honegger's works in this
medium. I'd suggest that the quartets might provide some of Müller-Zürich's finest
discoveries.
Walton suggests that by the time of the Violin Sonata Op. 32, the war
had charged his language with romanticism. Yes - Honegger's Violin Sonatas spring forward
as the closest parallels, and this composer's influence has yet to be traced in
Müller-Zürich's work. It's full-blooded in its rhetoric at times, yet elusive at the
edges. The Sonata is a work to return to.
The delightful Trio for basset-horn, viola and cello of 1981 comes with
the gooseberry flavours we expect in Hindemith, but with ripe fruit overtones and a light
finish. Les Six and composers like Ibert and Auric are never too far away, hence the light
ripe fruit.
This finally brings us to the Piano Quartet in c minor Op. 26. This is
for violin, clarinet, cello and piano, written in 1937, but revised in 1971 to greater
expressiveness. This is really a personally darker work, expressive and powerful. The
clarinet lends a wayward Englishness but the whole composition unwinds in a far less
neo-classic groundedness, or grindedness than in some other works. An empathic descending
theme where piano and winds double each other, tread out with a kind of heavy delicacy the
slightly sour baroque cut of the theme. It's as if French-Swiss influences like Honegger's
have infused form as well as colour. The second movement scurries into more assertive
neo-baroque, but again it's the French rather than Hindemithian cut that this falls prey
to. Catchy dotted rhythms attempt to harry the finale which eddies with private
ruminations. This fast movement contains some of the most memorable material since the
opening of the Viola Concerto. Themes chase each other across the counterpoint with a
melancholy zest.
A major discovery in Swiss music, Müller-Zürich might prove something
more, a fourth master. A substantial minor one on this showing, but enduring. Simon
Jenner
-------------------------
Paul Müller-Zürich was quite unknown to me until I heard this disc. He
was born in Zurich and studied with Busoni pupil, Philipp Jarnach and with that denizen of
the budget LP, conductor Volkmar Andreae. He moved to Paris for studies with Jean Batalla.
From 1927 to 1968 he lectured at the Zurich Conservatoire dying in Luzern in 1993. I do
not have any other information on him and would gladly have foregone Guild's paragraphs of
artist information for a list of works and dates. However the key thing is the music.
The concerto is decidedly neo-baroque in style but with romantic
tendencies. The Great Bach is never far from sight but then there are also several
Beethovenian strokes. The work may well remind you of Hindemith's Schwanendreher
Concerto. The 1965 mono ADD recording has its meed of hiss but nothing to detract unduly
from a work well worth the occasional airing. The Duetto second movement is a
gentle gem.
The remainder of the disc deploys vintage 2000 recordings of chamber
works. Tolinsky steers us through the composer's move towards greater harmonic astringency
and psychological complexity. Bach's presence is obscured only by some gentle
Schoenbergian mists. These are tougher aggravating little sketches.
The Sonata is a work of wartime Europe. In it the composer runs on a
neo-Baroque leash into frank romance. However he wanders not all that far from the
patterned path of Baroque grandeur - indeed, as in the concerto, there is a colossal
Handelian aspect to the invention. The themes are of generous amplitude across its fifteen
minute (two movement) span.
While the Trio is full of activity and the artistry of the performers
is never in doubt the work, which must be fun to play, does not register very deeply.
The two movement Piano Quartet received a make-over in 1971 though its
1937 vitality has not been drained. Overall it is the most memorable work here. Its almost
Gallic melos cannot disguise homage to Bachian structures but does soften their
inclination towards unrelenting mechanical action. The clarinet and cello lend a beguiling
'dressing' to this florid fantasia. It is in this work that Müller-Zürich liberates
himself from the not always benign rule of Johan Sebastian and he does this in a way
promised by the opening of the sonata but not fully delivered later. This work is tender -
the most human of all the pieces to be heard here. It is closer to John Ireland, and late
Fauré than to the Gothic megaliths of Bach and Handel.
Our reliable guide is Chris Walton, best known for his still largely
unrecognised work for the music of Othmar Schoeck. Walton sketches in the key details but
I would have liked more including a worklist.
Rob Barnett
American Record Guide January / February 2001
MÜLLER-ZURICh. Viola Concerto, Piano Pieces, op 1 0; Clarinet &
Piano Quartet in C minor, Violin Sonata; Basset-Hern Trio
Gerhard Weiser, va; Andrew Zolinsky, p; Roland Roberts, V, Miranda Davis, va"
Oliver Gledhill, vc; Alan Hacker, cl & bh; Beromünster Orchestra/ Edmond De Stoutz-
Guldd 7194-79:26
In May/June (p 230) we reviewed a two-violin concerto by this composer and suggested
that the disc was worth having just for that. The viola concerto recorded here confirms
that judgement. Here is an excellent composer whose music sounds "modern" enough
but never obnoxious-and still beautiful. I really like this viola concerto, and I honestly
think violists should take it up and play lt. (How very little they have that's worth
listening to!)
The piano pieces are also very pleasant. This composer had more of a gift of melody
than one would expect of someone who lived to 1993. The violin sonata is as good as most
written in this century. The quartet is a busy work; I am sure that piano, clarinet,
violin, and cello is just too much. How many prima donnas can you have? Three of the four
instruments are used to dominating whatever they play in. Together they produce some
chaotic moments. Not a great combination.
The basset-horn is not a favourite instrument, but the musical language has not changed
in the trio (with viola and cello), the latest work here. It has its moments; it is not
frivolous.
There are some oddities here. Although this is an English label, the Viola Concerto in
F minor is wrongly listed as "f minor", repeatedly (except on the front cover).
Americans are often insecure enough to follow the Germans in the lowercase F-wrong though
it is in English-but one assumes educated Englishmen know better. Also, the orchestra
listed here doesn't exist, according to the notes. But their recording sounds absolutely
up-to-date. So who did the recording of the viola concerto? On the last page of the
booklet (after all the German and French notes) we find out that it was recorded in 1963,
when the orchestra did exist-60 musicians from Swiss radio orchestras. And, finally, Paul
Müller was from Zurich, and it seems quite clear that he added the name of the city to
his name at some point. Are some of his works published under "Müller"? An
explanation would have been helpful, especially since the notes refer to him both ways.
But the sound and the performances are excellent (mostly English musicians in 2000),
and we are reminded that Swiss composers were still writing attractive music while their
German neighbours were beating us with abstract dissonances. Good music continued off the
beaten path; it may not have made headlines or had the shock value of the music that did,
but it will outlast the infamous tortures of the "avant-gardists". (What were
they the avant" of?) Of the works heard here, the viola concerto is from 1934, the
piano pieces from earlier yet, the quartet 1937. The violin sonata is from 1941, and the
trio (also called the Serenata Turicensis) is from 1981. Müller never wavered from
tonality; he never got terribly profound, either. But music need not be profound.
Certainly it need not be full of anguish and groaning. This is cheerful stuff.
VROON
International Record Review January 2001
Müller-Zürich NewIReissue
Viola Concerto in F minor, Op. 24a. Six Piano Pieces, Op. 10b.
Violin Sonata, Op. 32c:. Triod. Quartet in C minor, Op. 26e.
,aGerhard Weiser, dMiranda Davis (violas); ceRoland
Roberts (violin); deOllver Gledhill (Cello); bceAndrew
Zolinsky (piano); Alan Hacker (eclarinet/dbasset-horn),aSwiss
Radio Orchestra/Edmond de Stoutz.
Guild amono GMCD7194 (full price, 1 hour 19 minutes, aADD).
ProducerlEngineer bcdeMichael Ponder. Date a1963, bcdeMarch
20th-21st, 2000.
Paul Müller-Zürich (1898-1993) was a leading, figure in Swiss musical life during his
long lifetime: one of those many gifted Swiss composers whose music has somehow never
managed to travel much outside their native country, however receptive they themselves may
have been to contemporary developments in the rest of Europe. But perhaps his stock may be
posthumously on the rise. In the early 1990s Jecklin also released two discs, both
containing the Consenso and two Sinfoniettas. Last year Guild (which seems
to be developing a fruitful line in Swiss repertoire) issued some motets and a fine organ
Passacaglia on an excellent disc of Swiss religious works performed by, the choir of
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, while Musikszene Schweiz has recently brought out a
recordingg of Müller-Zürich's
Concerto for two violins, harpsichord and strings coupled with concertante works by his
contemporaries Hans Schaeuble and Hugo Pfister. The second also contains six flute sonatas
by another Swiss composer, Kaspar Fritz The disc under review now must, I suppose, be only
the second all-Müller-Zürich CD in history.
He's certainly worth it. If, groping for a Comparison, I say he seems something like a
Swiss Alan Rawsthorne,I don't merely mean to suggest that this is music of fine
craftsmanship, masterly counterpoint, economic dimensions, rather laconic on the emotional
side, and imbued with a profound but never arid neo-Classical impulse. I also allude to
the fact that a lot of mid-century Swiss music, in my experience, seems to have a
community of expression with the British music of the same period, and should definitely
appeal to collectors of, say, Rawsthorne, Rubbra, Walton or Vaughan Williams. Why this
should be I'm at a loss to say, unless there are unsuspected parallels in the national
Temperaments.
Like Rawsthome or Arnold Cooke, Müller-Zürich was clearly influenced by the music of
Hindemith, and his trim, busy, deftly scored Concerto for viola and small orchestra is
superficially very like one of Hindemith's Kammermusik concertos. But it contrives
to keep an individual stance: the 'Alla giga' finale has a French accent, and one of the
other movements is a brilliantly inventive passacaglia on a haunting ground curiously
reminiscent of Dido's Lament in Dido and Aeneas. Chris Walton's brief but
informative note says this is the second movement, but it's played third in this
performance: either the annotator made a slip or the composer subsequently revised the
ordering, for the recording -- its precise provenance, whether disc or broadcast,
undisclosed - dates back to 1963. Though the sound is slightly
pinched compared to present-day standards, it's entirely acceptable. Gerhard Weiser is
an excellent soloist.
The rest of the programme, in beautifully clear sound and performed by first-rate
British players, opens out the view of Müller-Zürich in what seem to be highly idiomatic
and sympathetic performances. The early set of piano pieces already shows an initially
Romantic impulse, somewhat in the manner of Othmar Schoeck, turning towards imitations of
the Baroque and a detached, ironic stance. The Quartet for violin, clarinet, cello and
piano (1937) and the Violin Sonata (1941) are perhaps the strongest works here: their
basically neo-Classical stance is continually enriched by the sheer wealth of musical
invention that Müller-Zürich brings to bear on his chosen forms, never allowing them to
become merely formulaic. Both works are in an unconventional two-movement shape: in the
Quartet the second movement is a brilliant tarantella-like piece combining the functions
of scherzo and finale, while in the Sonata it is an unusually searching and affecting set
of variations. Even the late Trio for the unusual combination of basset-horn (superbly
played here by Alan Hacker), viola and cello, although formally a serenade, impresses by
its energy and wit, with sly allusions to jazz and blues harmony combining intriguingly
with the rustic tones of the basset-horn. Altogether a diverting disc - another welcome
reminder that there's more to Swiss music than Schoeck, Martin and Holliger.
Calum MacDonald
Page revised 31.05.2001
|